The Internet is rife with websites that disseminate false news, such as WeLoveTrump. This is not a political remark, but rather the conclusion of a recent security investigation undertaken by DomainTools.
Many of the top news organisations in the United States were analysed in the new study to determine their susceptibility to domain squatting and phoney domains. According to DomainTools, the bogus URLs could be used to spread false information or malware.
As public cynicism of traditional media develops, protecting the public from disinformation campaigns has become crucial to the democratic process, according to Corin Imai, senior security advisor at DomainTools.
Which news outlets have the highest rating for fake news? And most importantly, what does this mean for the average news reader? You will likely be surprised by the responses.
Why Study Fake News Sites?
Authenticity and trust are essential components of exceptional customer service. The research conducted by DomainTools illustrates how malicious actors adopt tactics such as typosquatting and domain spoofing to engage in damaging actions.
Typosquatting, also known as URL hijacking, capitalises on typographical errors made by Internet users when entering a website’s address into a web browser. When a fraudster adopts the identity of a premium publisher, this is known as spoofing. In order to spread disinformation, these criminal activities may collect personally identifiable information, put malware on a device, or imitate news websites.
Imai explained, “It’s no secret that misleading methods have increased in recent years.” “Due to the development of fake news websites in recent years, we were intrigued by the idea of a connection between typosquatting and the dissemination of misinformation. We noticed that the domain names of prominent news organisations had been spoofed and exposed to typosquatting.”
A suspect source demonstrates at least one of the following characteristics: strong bias, frequent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to reputable material, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate dissemination of hoaxes and/or disinformation for financial gain or political sway.
Sources classified in the Questionable Category are potentially very unreliable and should be fact-checked for each individual article. Please note that sources on this list are not regarded to be false news unless otherwise specified in the justification section for each site.
Also Read: DateYou – Best Dating Site or Fake?
How To Avoid Fake News Sites?
Frequently, disinformation websites take advantage of the speed with which users navigate the Internet and their preferred news sources. According to DomainTools, these campaigns may steal and collect personally identifiable information, download malware to a device, or spoof news websites to spread disinformation.
What Is WeLoveTrump?
We Love Trump, also known as welovetrump.com, was established in 2016 by an anonymous conservative news and commentary website that frequently promotes pro-Trump misinformation and debunked conspiracy theories.
The website lacks a about page, does not identify its editors, and does not disclose its ownership.
We Love Trump does not disclose its owners and generates revenue through advertising, donations, and the online sale of pro-Trump/conservative merchandise. The online business is hosted by a questionable former provider; I adore my Liberty. In 2019, I Love my Freedom relaunched as an online retailer and switched their material to the dubious far-right website Trending Politics.
Currently, both We Love Trump and Trending Politics link their visitors to the online business I Love My Freedom. It appears that the proprietors of I Love My Freedom also own Trending Politics and We Love Trump, though we cannot confirm this. According to its previous about page, I Love my Freedom was co-owned by A. Ferretti, R. Nosbish, Jack Murphy, and Clayton Keirns. Once again, this is unconfirmed.
Analysis On WeLoveTrump
In conclusion, welovetrump.com promotes hyperpartisan conservative news and commentary ostensibly authored by website members. It is plausible to infer that there is no pro-liberal propaganda on this site, given that the members do not reveal their full identities and there are no apparent editorial guidelines.
This type of passionate language is commonly used in articles and headlines. Ignoring President Trump’s cease-and-desist letter, the Republican National Committee; is trouble brewing? The Washington Examiner and Politico contributed to this report.
We Love Trump has always supported the right, and former President Donald Trump in particular, while denouncing Democrats. In addition, they constantly spread incorrect information regarding the Covid-19 and the 2020 presidential election.
For example, they consistently disseminated false material regarding the usage of masks to prevent the spread of Coronavirus, such as “The Dangers of Masks.” Is This an Occult Mass Ritual? This article refers negatively to persons who wear masks as “Maskholes.”
In addition, they propagated the notion that wearing a mask is dangerous because it blocks oxygen. To show this, they link to someone through a mask containing a room carbon dioxide detector purchased from Lowes or Home Depot. They conclude that excessively high concentrations of carbon dioxide are hazardous.
At this point, I’d want to submit a simple question: if you wanted to quantify the impacts of mask wear on the user, would you rush out to Home Depot to get a carbon dioxide detector? Or would you use medical tools to determine the physiological impact of the mask on the actual wearer?
Also Read: How to Check if Anonup Is Down?
Is WeLoveTrump Bias?
This question’s response is unambiguous and has been verified. The mask’s primary function is to block the passage of large droplets. It has little effect on oxygen and carbon dioxide exchange.
For example, “the diameter of Coronaviruses ranges from 60 to 140 nanometers. The wavelength of oxygen is 0.120 nanometers, while that of carbon dioxide is 0.232 nanometers. The diameter of respiratory droplets ranges from 5,000 to 10,000 nanometers. The diameter of a cotton mask’s filtering holes is typically between 10 and 6000 nanometers.
Simply put, “mathematics and physics” reveal that face masks cannot block the passage of respiratory gases, but they can block the flow of respiratory droplets.
” Surgeons who wear masks for 12 hours or more provide more evidence that mask use does not affect gas exchange, according to Leann Poston, MD, of Invigor Medical. “Consider for a moment if face masks affected the quantities of carbon dioxide and oxygen in the blood,” she says. The surgeon’s brain chemistry would be affected.
It would have a negative impact on their fine motor skills. If face masks were even slightly capable of creating this result, an alternative would have been developed by now. The study can be found here.
During and after the 2020 presidential election, they frequently spread unproven conspiracy theories regarding electoral fraud. We Love Trump appears to accept the QAnon conspiracy theory, which asserts that former President Trump is engaged in a struggle against a deep state network of Satan-worshipping pedophiles: What Is Wrong With This Picture? We Love Trump is generally a right-leaning publication that frequently publishes false or misleading information.
Conclusion
We Love Trump is far-right biassed and problematic in general due to its promotion of conspiracy theories and propaganda, reliance on questionable sources, total lack of transparency, and several erroneous or misleading claims. We Love Trump receives a grade of severe right-wing bias and questionable due to its promotion of conspiracy theories and propaganda, its dependence on questionable sources, its complete lack of transparency, and a number of false or misleading claims.
Extremely biassed, We Love Trump reports on Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Inadequate Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, and False Claims, and contains very little factual reporting. According to the Media Bias Fact Check, its credibility is low.
